CASPIAN JOURNAL
MANAGEMENT AND HIGH TECHNOLOGIES
Methods and software for efficiency assessment of mainstay university professors’ activity
 |
Read | Kravets A.G., Aseeva S.D. Methods and software for efficiency assessment of mainstay university professors’ activity // Caspian journal : management and high technologies. — 2016. — №1. — pp. 90-102. |
Kravets A.G. - D.Sc. (Engineering), Professor, Volgograd State Technical University, 28 Lenin Ave., Volgograd, 400005, Russian Federation, agk@gde.ru
Aseeva S.D. - undergraduate, Volgograd State Technical University, 28 Lenin Ave., Volgograd, 400005, Russian Federation, aseevasvetlana00@gmail.com
The existing systems of performance evaluation of professorial and teaching staff of a mainstay university are reviewed in this article. It is proved that at the present stage the most rational approach to evaluating the performance of the faculty is the rating approach. it allows you to take into account the comprehensive assessment of particular indicators of different types of activity. The aim of the study was to develop methods and mechanisms of usage the modern information technologies to automate the process of analyzing the effectiveness of faculties’ activities. The authors proposed a new method of the heterogeneous business processes data integration for the mainstay university professors’ performance evaluation. The article describes the structure of the design process for a system of calculation the rating evaluation system. This system was developed on the basis of 1C : Enterprise. In this article it is provided the description of the methods of collecting and analyzing activity data, the methods of formation a database, development of metadata objects, which implement the method of rating teaching staff activities, ranking all the data on the various categories. During the work, it was created a computer program, which simplifies the process of entering and processing data to calculate the rating evaluation of the professorial and teaching staff of the university.
Key words: преподаватели вузов, оценка результатов деятельности, рейтинговая система, принятие решений, автоматизация, адаптируемая система, информационная система, rating system, evaluation of department’s activities, automation, adaptable system, information syste